Two weeks ago we heard Sam's side of the story. IM Shankland played well, calculated accurately in the critical moment, and took advantage of an obvious blunder. What is IM Daniel Rensch's explanation for his play? Well, as Danny reveals for us in today's video, he might have been closer to executing his "Blumenfeld attacking compensation" then we first thought. Check it out... Full video available at http://www.Chess.com/videos