EVIDENCE 17: PROSECUTORS MANIPULATING CONTENTS OF CCTV 3 FOLDER: CASE OF JESSICA KUMALA WONGSO
Balige Academy
2024-07-15
Views 5
The 37 Scientific Evidence of Digital Evidence Tampering on CCTV Footage at Olivier Café: The Jessica Kumala Wongso Case (2016), Carried Out by Muhammad Nuh Al-Azhar and Christopher Hariman Rianto, Who were Under the Leadership of the General Crime Director of the Jakarta Metropolitan Police, Krishna Murti, and the Chief of the Jakarta Metropolitan Police, Tito Karnavian.
EVIDENCE 17: CHANGES IN THE CONTENTS OF CCTV 3 FOLDER IN THE PROSECUTOR'S HANDS AT DIFFERENT TIMES
The changes in the contents of the CCTV 3 folder on a flash drive held by the prosecutor were a serious indication of issues regarding the integrity of the digital evidence in the case. This finding, revealed through a broadcast highlighting the prosecutor's flash drive when Rasmiati and Agus Triono were presented in court, raised doubts about the reliability of the evidence presented during the trial. The discrepancy in the number of video files between two different time periods raised questions about the consistency and sufficiency of the evidence to accurately depict the events in question. The lack of adequate explanation for these changes indicated a failure to maintain the integrity of the digital data held by the prosecutor and suggested potential hidden motives behind their actions.
The CCTV 3 footage is crucial in the case against Jessica Wongso, as it allegedly shows her turning towards table 54 and appearing to anticipate the presence of CCTV cameras at Café Olivier. This particular footage is pivotal because it aims to establish a narrative of premeditation and awareness of surveillance on Jessica's part, which could significantly impact the prosecution's case by suggesting that she was conscious of being watched and potentially manipulating her actions accordingly.
However, the changes in the contents of the CCTV 3 folder in the hands of the prosecutor cast serious doubt on the integrity and reliability of this critical evidence. The discrepancy in the number of video files at different times suggests that the evidence may have been tampered with or altered. Such alterations without proper explanation raise questions about whether the footage accurately represents what transpired or if it has been manipulated to support the prosecution's case against Jessica. This inconsistency undermines the prosecution's argument and could indicate a breach of the legal process, thereby jeopardizing the authenticity of the evidence presented in court.
The combination of these factors – Jessica Wongso's alleged actions caught on CCTV 3 and the subsequent unexplained changes to the footage – highlights significant concerns regarding the integrity of the digital evidence and the overall fairness of the trial. If the prosecutor's handling of the CCTV 3 folder lacks transparency and accountability, it not only weakens the case against Jessica but also erodes public trust in the judicial system. Ensuring the integrity and authenticity of all evidence is paramount to achieving a fair a
EVIDENCE 17: CHANGES IN THE CONTENTS OF CCTV 3 FOLDER IN THE PROSECUTOR'S HANDS AT DIFFERENT TIMES
The changes in the contents of the CCTV 3 folder on a flash drive held by the prosecutor were a serious indication of issues regarding the integrity of the digital evidence in the case. This finding, revealed through a broadcast highlighting the prosecutor's flash drive when Rasmiati and Agus Triono were presented in court, raised doubts about the reliability of the evidence presented during the trial. The discrepancy in the number of video files between two different time periods raised questions about the consistency and sufficiency of the evidence to accurately depict the events in question. The lack of adequate explanation for these changes indicated a failure to maintain the integrity of the digital data held by the prosecutor and suggested potential hidden motives behind their actions.
The CCTV 3 footage is crucial in the case against Jessica Wongso, as it allegedly shows her turning towards table 54 and appearing to anticipate the presence of CCTV cameras at Café Olivier. This particular footage is pivotal because it aims to establish a narrative of premeditation and awareness of surveillance on Jessica's part, which could significantly impact the prosecution's case by suggesting that she was conscious of being watched and potentially manipulating her actions accordingly.
However, the changes in the contents of the CCTV 3 folder in the hands of the prosecutor cast serious doubt on the integrity and reliability of this critical evidence. The discrepancy in the number of video files at different times suggests that the evidence may have been tampered with or altered. Such alterations without proper explanation raise questions about whether the footage accurately represents what transpired or if it has been manipulated to support the prosecution's case against Jessica. This inconsistency undermines the prosecution's argument and could indicate a breach of the legal process, thereby jeopardizing the authenticity of the evidence presented in court.
The combination of these factors – Jessica Wongso's alleged actions caught on CCTV 3 and the subsequent unexplained changes to the footage – highlights significant concerns regarding the integrity of the digital evidence and the overall fairness of the trial. If the prosecutor's handling of the CCTV 3 folder lacks transparency and accountability, it not only weakens the case against Jessica but also erodes public trust in the judicial system. Ensuring the integrity and authenticity of all evidence is paramount to achieving a fair a
Report form
RELATED VIDEOS
