Substantially Similar Jobs Don't Have to Be Identical Jobs in Discrimination Cases
Sequence Media Group
2015-02-06
Views 40
For more information, go to http://legalbroadcastnetwork.com
Labor lawyer Paul Mollica discusses the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals' opinion in Riser v. QEP Energy, a discrimation case with claims under the Equal Pay Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The court remanded the case after a summary judgment. A key holding on appeal is that two jobs do not have to be identical in order to be "substantially equal" when deciding a discrimination question.
Labor lawyer Paul Mollica discusses the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals' opinion in Riser v. QEP Energy, a discrimation case with claims under the Equal Pay Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The court remanded the case after a summary judgment. A key holding on appeal is that two jobs do not have to be identical in order to be "substantially equal" when deciding a discrimination question.
Report form
